definitions.html
The overarching goal of school funding is to provide equality of educational
opportunity for all of Minnesota’s children The following are the definitions of the five key school finance system components
needed to reach this goal:
To meet high student performance standards, quality teaching is one
of the most important single factors. To attract and retain high quality teachers, funding must enable school
districts to develop a teacher compensation system, which reflects the
teacher’s knowledge and skills brought to the classroom. The funding formula has a built-in increase that maintains sufficient
funding for areas that can be controlled by local districts and respond
to costs which exceed normal inflationary increases. Resources provided by funding formulas to achieve an adequate educational
program must recognize documented cost differences such as: (1) costs
of supporting student learning for those impacted by poverty and mobility
or who are English Language Learners (ELL); and provides the extra help
costs of instructing and supporting students with special needs; (2)
demographic cost differences including pupil sparsity, declining enrollment
and increased transportation costs; (3) market-based operating cost
differentials. New mandates for programs or services shall be accompanied by sufficient
revenue to implement and sustain them.
Funding formulas must recognize that different levels of resources
will be required from district to district to ensure that students with
equal needs are treated equally. The property tax effort required to offer students an adequate educational
program, as defined above, shall be equal for all taxpayers within each
classification.
Revenue sources are sufficiently broad based to minimize the effects
of fluctuations in state revenue. Predictable sources of revenue are known prior to districts making
decisions required to prepare the annual budget. A sustainable funding system creates the confidence and trust families
and schools need to support quality educational programs. A sustainable funding system allows school districts to complete long-range
planning that enhances efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability.
A finance system's accountability is measured by its ability to recognize
the important role education plays in our state's continued economic
growth and competitiveness and to provide the resources needed for higher
student achievement. The finance system must be easy to understand and explain to the public.
The finance system must clearly relate dollars expended to student
achievement. The finance system must provide clarity and consistency in financial
reporting across all districts. (Ex. Standardized chart of accounts
for tracking expenditures) The finance system must clearly delineate between actual new resources
and those that are simply shifted from other sources and do not result
in actual funding increases at the district level. The finance system must clearly identify those areas were local district
spending is impacted by state or federal statues or mandates.
School districts, administrators and teachers are accountable for
student performance as measured by Basic Standards Tests and for satisfying
the requirements of the Profile of Learning. Schools should be accountable
for those conditions under their control. Local school districts, administrators, teachers and the State must
jointly be held accountable and responsible for improving instruction
and academic achievement for Minnesota students. Monitor student progress to ensure that students are making progress
and are on track to meet the basic skills and Profile of Learning requirements
to graduate from high school Diagnose students’ educational needs and facilitate adjustments in
curriculum / instruction to meet those needs Facilitate continuous improvement—Measure progress of individual students
over time (as opposed to comparisons of different cohorts of students);
identify and support specific behaviors / actions by school districts,
schools, teachers, parents, students, etc. that have a demonstrated
impact on the progress of individual students over time. Strengthen the partnership between parents and schools. is valid and reliable for students at different levels of learning
tracks individual student progress across a broad range of indicators
is not duplicative limits the amount of time taken away from regular instruction and
learning uses strategies and tools built on current best practices in local
school districts provides continuous, data-driven district and school tools and resources
provides significant support to schools in the integration, analysis,
and interpretation of data provides training, technical assistance, software, and a “best practices
network” for student accountability surveys community, parent, and student satisfaction with their local
schools is designed to support improved individual student achievement, not
penalize or sort schools
The purpose of academic accountability is to:
Academic accountability requires assessment that: